Perhaps. I wouldn't have a problem with calling it a tilt; I agree it wasn't an extreme gerrymander. Having watched virtually all of the AIRC meetings, I did see the majority pretty consistently vote in a "tilted" way (IMHO), and absent a couple of very questionable decisions they made, it probably would have been 5 to 4 one way or the other, which would be a better match to statewide results. But yes, not extreme.
Perhaps. I wouldn't have a problem with calling it a tilt; I agree it wasn't an extreme gerrymander. Having watched virtually all of the AIRC meetings, I did see the majority pretty consistently vote in a "tilted" way (IMHO), and absent a couple of very questionable decisions they made, it probably would have been 5 to 4 one way or the other, which would be a better match to statewide results. But yes, not extreme.